DNP-955A DPI Project Part I 

This course acts as a guide, steering you through the initial stages of your Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program. More than just accumulating knowledge, DNP-955A DPI Project Part I sets the stage for practical application in healthcare transformation. 

In this course, critical dimensions such as project identification, problem formulation, and literature review take the spotlight. These are the foundational elements on which your entire DNP Project will rest. DNP-955A DPI Project Part I empowers you to integrate evidence-based practices into your nursing expertise, addressing real healthcare challenges. The course emphasizes understanding stakeholders, the key players in healthcare whose perspectives will shape your project’s trajectory. With honed communication, collaboration, and leadership skills, you’ll navigate the intricate landscape of healthcare transformations.

Consider DNP-955A DPI Project Part I as the opening chapter of your DNP story, where theory transforms into practical impact. As you tackle project design, barrier analysis, and methodology creation, picture the lasting change your DNP Project could bring to healthcare. This course isn’t just a learning experience; it’s your first tangible move toward making a real difference in healthcare. Get ready to untangle the threads of your chosen healthcare focus, armed not only with knowledge but also with a commitment to creating positive change.

Key elements of DNP-955A DPI Project Part I

The DNP-955A Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project stands as a pivotal gateway in your transformative journey towards advanced nursing practice. Part I of this project serves as the bedrock upon which your entire investigation rests, meticulously laying the groundwork for impactful research and meaningful change. Delving into the key elements of this crucial stage empowers you to craft a strong proposal, chart a focused path, and ultimately, pave the way for a successful DPI project.

Project Idea and Significance

Your DPI project begins with a spark, a burning desire to address a gap in practice within your nursing domain. The initial quest lies in selecting a compelling topic, one that resonates with your passion and aligns with your program’s requirements. Consider areas where your expertise can bridge the existing knowledge gap and where your project’s findings can spark genuine improvements in patient care, healthcare quality, or the nursing profession itself. Once the topic is secured, articulate its significance. Craft a compelling narrative that underscores the importance of addressing this issue and how your project uniquely contributes to positive change.

Conducting a Thorough Literature Review

Like detectives in pursuit of truth, you embark on a meticulous journey through the realm of existing research. Utilize robust academic databases and critically analyze published studies related to your chosen topic. Delve into their strengths and limitations, identifying areas where knowledge remains elusive. This comprehensive review serves as the cornerstone for your own investigation, allowing you to build upon existing knowledge and chart a course towards filling crucial gaps. As you synthesize your findings, ensure a seamless integration into your research question and methodology, demonstrating how your project stands firmly on the shoulders of giants.

Establishing a Strong Conceptual Framework

Your conceptual framework becomes the sturdy bridge guiding your research across the river of inquiry. Choose an appropriate theoretical model that serves as the lens through which you investigate your research question. This framework provides a structure for understanding the relationships between variables or phenomena within your project, offering a deeper comprehension of the mechanisms at play. Ensure a strong connection between your chosen framework and your research question, demonstrating how it guides your investigation and interpretation of findings.

Crafting a Focused Research Question and Hypotheses

Your research question becomes the crux of your entire investigation. Craft a clear, concise, and well-defined question that directly addresses the gap in knowledge identified in your literature review. Avoid ambiguity and ensure it can be effectively explored through the chosen methodology. For quantitative or mixed-methods projects, consider developing specific hypotheses that you will test through data collection and analysis. These hypotheses, rooted in your research question, serve as stepping stones on your path to uncovering knowledge and generating impactful results.

Justification for Your Research Methodology

Navigating the research landscape requires selecting the most appropriate tools for the journey. Carefully choose your research methodology (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods) based on your research question, project feasibility, and access to resources. Explain your rationale for the chosen method, demonstrating how it aligns with your investigation’s needs and offers the most effective means of answering your research question. Be mindful of ethical considerations and potential limitations associated with each approach.

Creating a Detailed Timeline and Budget

Time, like resources, is a precious commodity. Develop a realistic timeline for each project phase, outlining a roadmap for literature review, data collection, analysis, dissemination, and potential unforeseen obstacles. Account for buffer periods and factor in anticipated complexities. Parallel to this, craft a meticulous budget that estimates all project expenses, including equipment, supplies, participant incentives, and travel costs. Justify your budget allocations and demonstrate cost-effectiveness, ensuring sound financial stewardship throughout the project.

Outlining a Dissemination Plan

Your findings deserve to be seen, heard, and embraced. Design a dissemination plan that engages key stakeholders interested in your project’s results. Identify healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and community members who can benefit from your insights. Develop strategies for sharing your findings through publications, presentations, conferences, or community outreach initiatives. Plan for the implementation and sustainability of your project, outlining how your findings can translate into practice and promote lasting change within the healthcare system.

Addressing Ethical Considerations

Ethical conduct is the guiding star of any research endeavor. Demonstrate your understanding of ethical research principles and guidelines, particularly if your project involves participant recruitment or data collection. Carefully consider any potential risks associated with your project and outline specific strategies for mitigating them. Obtaining informed consent from participants and ensuring data confidentiality are paramount concerns. As you navigate the research landscape, remember that ethical conduct paves the way for trustworthy findings and ultimately, a project that stands the test of time.

DNP-955A DPI Project Part I Topics

DNP 955 Topic 1 DPI Project Proposal Strategic Points

During the “DNP 820 – 10 Strategic Points for The Prospectus, Proposal, And Direct Practice Improvement Project,” students are expected to refine their project’s foundation, methodology, and intervention plan while crafting a detailed blueprint for data collection and analysis.

Refining the Foundation

  • Sharpen your PICOT question: Ensure it clearly defines the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and timeframe of your research.
  • Bolster your literature review: Add at least 10 recent primary sources (within 5 years) to build a solid research base. Remember, quality over quantity; focus on relevant, impactful studies.

Strengthening Methodology and Design

  • Embrace quantitative methods: Ditch qualitative approaches – your goal is to gather measurable data for analysis.
  • Choose a specific research design: Pre-posttest, correlational, or another design relevant to your research question should be clearly outlined and justified.

Crafting a Compelling Intervention

  • Break down the plan: Detail each step of your intervention implementation, from initial rollout to follow-up.
  • Ground it in evidence: Cite supporting research demonstrating the intervention’s potential effectiveness.
  • Define your role: Specify your responsibilities and involvement in implementing the intervention.

Mapping Data Collection

  • Identify valid and reliable instruments: Surveys, questionnaires, or other tools for gathering data must be demonstrably accurate and appropriate for your research.
  • Outline the process: Step-by-step, detail how you will collect data, from obtaining informed consent to recording responses.
  • Define participant selection: Set clear inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure a relevant and reliable sample population.

Charting Data Analysis

  • Choose appropriate descriptive statistics: Mean, median, standard deviation, etc., should be selected strategically to accurately portray your data.
  • Determine the comparative test: Specify the statistical test you’ll use to compare data between groups based on your research design.
  • Factor in p-value considerations: Set the threshold for statistical significance to guide your conclusions.

DNP 955 Topic 2 DPI Project Timeline

In “DNP 955 Topic 2 DPI Project Timeline,” students are expected to:

Develop a timeline for their DPI Project and Chapter 1 Proposal Introduction

  • Use the provided “DPI Project Timeline” resource to plan milestones and deliverables for the remaining three courses of the program.
  • Adapt the “DPI Proposal Template” to draft your Chapter 1 Introduction, covering background, problem statement, project purpose, clinical questions, and more.

Complete Chapter 2 Literature Review (minimum 30 pages)

  • Expand upon your DNP-820 literature review with at least 25 empirical or scholarly articles, 85% published within the past 5 years.
  • Use the PICOT format to identify relevant articles and the “Research Article Chart” to analyze and synthesize them.
  • Focus on articles supporting your proposal and identify subthemes within the main theme of your research.
  • Ensure at least one article per subtheme uses a quantitative methodology and write synthesis statements summarizing the findings.

Additional expectations

  • Adhere to APA formatting and rubric guidelines for each assignment.
  • Submit Chapter 1 to LopesWrite for plagiarism checking.
  • Track and log 10 hours of real-world practice immersion related to your project using the “Practice Hours Completion Statement.

DNP 955 Topic 3 DPI Project Proposal Chapter 1 Introduction to the Project 

Lay the foundation for their DPI Project Proposal by crafting a comprehensive introduction. This chapter sets the stage for the entire project, providing essential background information and outlining the proposed intervention. Here’s a breakdown of the key expectations:

Project Proposal Chapter 1 objectives

  • Introduction: Briefly introduce the project and its significance.
  • Background of the Project: Provide context for the problem being addressed, including any relevant statistics, trends, or literature.
  • Problem Statement: Clearly define the specific problem your project aims to address. Use the PICOT format (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) to ensure clarity and focus.
  • Purpose of the Project: Explain the overall goal of your project and how it will address the identified problem.
  • Clinical Question(s): Formulate specific research questions that guide your project and data collection. These questions should be directly related to your PICOT statement.
  • Advancing Scientific Knowledge: Explain how your project contributes to existing knowledge in the field and potentially advances practice.
  • Significance of the Project: Highlight the importance of your project and its potential impact on patient care, practice, or policy.
  • Rationale for Methodology: Justify the chosen research methodology (quantitative) and explain how it aligns with your project goals and research questions.
  • Nature of the Project Design: Describe the specific research design you will employ (e.g., pre-posttest, correlational).
  • Definition of Terms: Define any key terms or concepts used in the project to ensure clarity.
  • Assumptions, Limitations, Delimitations: Acknowledge any limitations or assumptions inherent in your project design.
  • Summary and Organization of the Remainder of the Project: Briefly summarize the content of the following chapters and provide a roadmap for the reader.

DNP 955 Topic 4 DPI Project Proposal Chapter 2 Literature Review

DNP 955 Topic 4 DPI Project Proposal Chapter 2 Literature Review” expects students to build upon their existing literature review by expanding it to a minimum of 30 pages, focusing on strong support for their proposed intervention. Here’s a breakdown of the key expectations:

Depth and Breadth of Research

  • 25 articles minimum: Identify and analyze at least 25 empirical or scholarly articles, ensuring 85% are published within the past 5 years.
  • PICOT focus: Use the PICOT format to guide your article selection, ensuring they directly relate to your research question and proposed intervention.
  • Subthemes: Divide your main research theme into at least three subthemes and identify additional articles related to each (18 articles total).

Analysis and Synthesis

  • Research Article Chart: Utilize the provided “Research Article Chart” as a framework to analyze and synthesize each article, covering author, research question, sample, methodology, limitations, findings, and potential implementation.
  • Quantitative emphasis: Ensure at least one article per sub theme utilizes a quantitative methodology to strengthen your research foundation.
  • Synthesis statements: Write concise statements summarizing the findings of each sub theme based on the analyzed articles. Aim for six synthesis statements covering all themes and subthemes.

Additional Requirements

  • Clear organization: Structure your chapter logically, grouping articles by theme and subtheme.
  • Proper citation: Cite all sources accurately and consistently using APA style.
  • Rubric adherence: Review the course rubric to ensure your literature review meets all expectations.
  • LopesWrite submission: Submit your completed chapter to LopesWrite for plagiarism checking.

DNP 955 Topic 5 DPI Project Proposal Chapter 3 Methodology

In “DNP 955 Topic 5 DPI Project Proposal Chapter 3 Methodology,” you refine your research design and data collection plan, turning ideas into a feasible action plan. Here’s what you’re expected to do:

1. Refine your methodology choice

  • Quantitative focus: Remember, qualitative methods are not allowed. Justify your chosen quantitative approach based on your project goals and research questions.
  • Specific design selection: Clearly outline the specific research design you’ll use (e.g., pre-posttest, quasi-experimental) and explain how it aligns with your methodology and research questions.

2. Craft a detailed intervention plan

  • Step-by-step breakdown: Clearly define each step of your intervention implementation, from initial rollout to follow-up. Be specific and ensure each step is actionable.
  • Evidence base: Ground your intervention in existing research and evidence demonstrating its potential effectiveness. Cite supporting literature to showcase its basis.
  • Your role: Define your specific responsibilities and involvement in implementing the intervention throughout the project.

3. Map out your data collection strategy

  • Instrument selection: Identify the specific instruments, surveys, or questions you’ll use to gather data from participants. Ensure each tool is valid and reliable with supporting citations.
  • Process breakdown: Provide a step-by-step explanation of how you will collect data, from obtaining informed consent to recording responses. Be accurate and detailed.
  • Participant selection: Clearly define your inclusion and exclusion criteria for participant selection. Justify your choices based on your research question and feasibility.

4. Design your data analysis plan

  • Descriptive statistics: Choose appropriate descriptive statistics (e.g., means, standard deviations) to summarize your data, justifying your selections with references.
  • Comparative testing: Determine the specific statistical test you’ll use to compare data between groups based on your research design. Explain your choice and p-value considerations.

5. Remember the big picture

  • Rubric adherence: Carefully review the rubric to ensure your methodology addresses all expectations and meets the required criteria.
  • APA formatting: Apply APA style guidelines consistently throughout your chapter for professional presentation.
  • Instructor guidance: Don’t hesitate to seek clarification from your instructor if you encounter any uncertainties or ambiguities.

DNP 955 Topic 7 Initial Learner Self Review and Soft Submission

In “DNP 955 Topic 7 Initial Learner Self Review and Soft Submission,” you’ll take a critical look at your progress on the DPI Project Proposal and submit a draft for instructor feedback. It’s an opportunity to assess your work so far, refine your research plan, and ensure you’re on the right track before finalizing your proposal.

Here’s what you’re expected to do:

1. Conduct a comprehensive self-review

  • Chapters 1-3: Evaluate your work on the introduction, literature review, and methodology chapters. Identify areas of strength and weaknesses for each.
  • Alignment with Strategic Points: Assess how well your proposal aligns with the 10 Strategic Points drafted in Topic 2. Are there any discrepancies or adjustments needed?
  • Overall research focus: Reflect on the clarity and consistency of your research question, intervention plan, and data collection strategy.

2. Draft a clear and concise self-review report

  • Structure your report: Use a logical format that addresses each chapter, the Strategic Points, and your overall research focus.
  • Highlight strengths: Point out areas where you feel confident and explain your reasoning.
  • Identify areas for improvement: Be honest and specific about weaknesses or uncertainties you have identified.
  • Propose solutions: Suggest potential ways to address any areas needing improvement or clarification.

3. Prepare your soft submission

  • Chapters 1-3 draft: Submit a complete draft of your introduction, literature review, and methodology chapters for instructor feedback.
  • Self-review report: Include your self-review report alongside your chapters as part of the soft submission.

4. Seek feedback and make adjustments

  • Utilize instructor feedback: Carefully review your instructor’s feedback and use it to refine your proposal.
  • Address identified issues: Take the opportunity to address any weaknesses or ambiguities pointed out by your instructor.
  • Strengthen your research plan: Use the feedback as a guide to finalize your proposal and ensure it’s a well-developed and feasible research plan.

DNP 955 Topic 8 Benchmark DPI Project Proposal: Draft Proposal (Chapters 1-3 and Appendix A) 

Here’s a breakdown of the expectations for “DNP 955 Topic 8 Benchmark DPI Project Proposal: Draft Proposal (Chapters 1-3 and Appendix A)”:


  • To create a comprehensive and well-structured draft of the first three chapters of your DPI Project Proposal, along with Appendix A (Strategic Points).
  • To demonstrate your understanding of the project’s background, problem statement, literature review, methodology, and overall research design.
  • To receive feedback from your instructor and make necessary refinements before final submission.

Assignment Components

  1. Chapter 1: Introduction to the Project (as outlined in Topic 3)
  2. Chapter 2: Literature Review (as outlined in Topic 4)
  3. Chapter 3: Methodology (as outlined in Topic 5)
  4. Appendix A: 10 Strategic Points (from Topic 2)


What are the main topics covered in DNP-955A DPI Project Part I?

DNP-955A DPI Project Part I on laying the groundwork and developing your DPI project proposal. This typically involves several key topics:

1. Project Foundation:

  • Refining your PICOT question: Ensuring your research question is clearly defined and focuses on the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Timeframe.
  • Strengthening your literature review: Building a solid research base by analyzing relevant and recent scholarly articles to support your project.
  • Developing a theoretical framework: Grounding your research in existing theories and concepts that guide your intervention and understanding of the problem.

2. Intervention Design:

  • Crafting a compelling intervention plan: Detailing each step of your proposed practice change, including implementation, recruitment, and evaluation strategies.
  • Justifying your chosen methodology: Explaining why a quantitative approach is appropriate for your project and aligning it with your PICOT question.
  • Defining participant selection criteria: Identifying who will be eligible to participate in your intervention based on inclusion and exclusion criteria.

3. Data Collection and Analysis:

  • Mapping out your data collection plan: Choosing valid and reliable instruments (surveys, questionnaires) to gather data from participants.
  • Outlining the data collection process: Describing how you will obtain informed consent, record responses, and manage ethical considerations.
  • Designing your data analysis plan: Selecting appropriate statistical tests to analyze your data and draw meaningful conclusions from the findings.

4. Project Management and Timeline:

  • Developing a realistic and feasible timeline: Planning milestones and deliverables for each phase of your project, considering resource limitations and timelines.
  • Identifying potential challenges and mitigation strategies: Anticipating any obstacles you might encounter and proposing solutions to overcome them.
  • Building a support network: Collaborating with mentors, advisors, and stakeholders to ensure successful project implementation.

5. Introduction to the Project Proposal

  • Background and problem statement: Providing context for the problem you’re addressing and its significance for practice.
  • Project purpose and clinical questions: Articulating your overall goal and specific research questions that guide your data collection and analysis.
  • Significance and advancement of knowledge: Highlighting the potential impact of your project on practice, policy, or knowledge in the field.

These are the main topics typically covered in “DNP-955A DPI Project Part I.” However, the specific details and emphasis might vary depending on your institution’s program curriculum and instructor’s expectations.

What are the common challenges students face in DNP-955A DPI Project Part I?

here are some common challenges students encounter in DNP-955A DPI Project Part I:

1. Refining and Focusing the PICOT Question:

  • Difficulty clearly defining the patient population, intervention, comparison group, outcome, and timeframe.
  • Struggling to ensure the question is specific, measurable, and relevant to practice.
  • Balancing the scope of the research question with feasibility and available resources.

2. Conducting a Comprehensive Literature Review:

  • Finding relevant and up-to-date scholarly articles related to the chosen PICOT question.
  • Effectively synthesizing and analyzing complex research findings from multiple sources.
  • Integrating ethical considerations and potential biases within the literature review.

3. Developing a Feasible and Effective Intervention:

  • Aligning the intervention with the identified problem and research question.
  • Balancing innovation with practical implementation possibilities within the project timeframe.
  • Addressing ethical considerations and participant safety within the intervention plan.

4. Choosing Appropriate Data Collection Methods and Instruments:

  • Selecting valid and reliable tools to measure the specific outcomes targeted by the intervention.
  • Piloting and testing instruments to ensure clarity and effectiveness for data collection.
  • Adhering to ethical guidelines and obtaining informed consent from participants.

5. Planning and Managing the Project Effectively:

  • Creating a realistic timeline that takes into account resource limitations and competing priorities.
  • Identifying potential challenges and developing mitigation strategies early in the project.
  • Communicating effectively with mentors, advisors, and stakeholders throughout the process.

Must Read:

Need Help? Chat with us!
Start a Conversation
Hi! Click one of our members below to chat on WhatsApp
We usually reply in a few minutes